| |
Faculty
Curriculum Committee (FCC) Members, 2008-2009
- Perkins Jr., Robert
(Foundations, Secondary and Special Education), Chair
- Bruns, John
(English)
- Coseru, Cristian
(Philosophy)
- Gavidia, Jose V.
(Management & Entrepreneurship)
- Johnston-Thom,
Katherine (Mathematics)
- Muldrow, Ralph (Art
History)
- Nenno, Nancy (German
& Slavic Studies), Secretary
- Sotka, Erik (Biology)
- Verlinden, Marianne
(Hispanic Studies)
Fall
2008 Deadlines for Proposals to be received by the FCC Chair before
3 pm: September 10, October 8 and November 5
The Committee will be meeting in EDCTR 109 at 5:00 on September 22, October 20, and November 17
respectively to discuss those proposals submitted. Departments should
plan on a representative attending the respective meeting to answer any
questions the committee may have so that there are no hold ups.
Approved
Proposals will be presented at the corresponding Senate meetings:
October 7 (agenda items due 9/25), November 11 (agenda items due 10/30), and December 9 (agenda items due 12/1) respectively.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| General
Guidelines for Proposals back
to top |
The Association of American Colleges and
Universities (AACU) has been the voice of liberal education for over 80
years. At the end of the 1980s it inaugurated the project
"Liberal Learning and the Arts and Sciences Major." The undergraduate
experience was analyzed from many perspectives by a national
panel and twelve national societies. A strongly learner-oriented,
liberal arts view emerged. A number of departments at the College
of Charleston have participated in a self-examination known
as "Re-Forming the Major." The Committee on
Curriculum and Academic Planning has adopted the AACU's
framework for program review (Program Review and Educational Quality in
the Major) as its guide for considering new programs (majors or
degrees), new concentrations, new minors and any major revisions of the
aforesaid. The committee's deliberations will be focused by such
questions as the following:
- What are the goals, objectives and intended
outcomes of the program?
- How do the beginning, middle and end of
the curriculum develop the goal objectives and intended outcomes
of the program?
- How are the goals and the intended outcome of
the program made clear to the students?
- Are the program goals linked to specific
courses (as manifested, for example, in syllabi)?
- Do the courses in the major provide depth and
perspective in a context that will enhance the liberal education of
the students? Conversely, is the selection of the courses so narrow and
specialized
that the major interferes with rather than enhances liberal education?
|
|
| General
Procedures for Course and Program Changes back to top |
- The Academic department prepares the proposal
on the appropriate Faculty Curriculum Committee (FCC) proposal form,
and any required supporting documentation as stated in the
form.
- Proposal package (i.e. proposal form and
supporting documentation) is directed to the dean of the school for
review. If approved, the dean signs the form and returns the package to
the department chair. The package should be first directed by the
chair's office to the Business Office or Provost (see ordered list of
signatures on the specific proposal form involved).
- Department chair forwards the package to the
Business Office if necessary (see list of signatures on the form). The
head of the Business Office signs the form, and reports his/her
recommendation when the package is returned to the department chair.
- Department chair forwards the package to the
Provost if necessary (see list of signatures on the form). The Provost
signs the form, and the package is returned to the department
chair.
- The department chair submits the proposal
package for FCC review. Please send the hardcopy package including the
proposal with signatures to the FCC chair. The department must also
email a matching electronic version of the package (except for
signatures) to the FCC chair. Both versions must be received by the FCC
proposal review deadline stated earlier on this website.
- The FCC reviews the proposal at a public
meeting announced via email by the FCC chair. The FCC
optionally recommends that departments send representatives to the
meeting to answer any questions from committee members.
- If the Committee approves the proposal, the FCC
chair signs the original form and submits it with supporting
documentation to the Speaker of the Faculty Senate. The proposal is
then included as a motion at the next meeting of the Senate.
- If the Senate approves the motion, the Faculty
Secretary signs the original form and sends it to the
Registrar.
- The Registrar then takes the actions outlined
below.
A.
Information is entered into the SIS course inventory.
B. Information
about the change is communicated to:
- Department chair
- Business Affairs Office (establishes
course fee structure in SIS, referral to Board for necessary approval)
- College Relations (for addition to the
Undergraduate Catalog)
- Academic Affairs Office (Attn: Provost,
c/o Beth Murphy)
|
|
List of Curriculum
Committee Forms
back to top
|
|
| The Curriculum
Committee Web Page is maintained by Robert Perkins and was last updated
August 18, 2008. Please e-mail comments or suggestions to: perkinsr@cofc.edu
|
|
|