The Freshwater Gastropods of South Carolina
SC home :: introduction :: dichotomous key :: photo gallery & species accounts :: discussion :: recommendations :: FWGNA home
> Discussion
Although the
sites visited by myself and my colleagues throughout the state of South
Carolina probably numbered in excess of one thousand, only 376 were
positive for freshwater gastropods. Figure 1 shows the 376 sites mapped on
the five USEPA Ecoregions of South Carolina, and Table 1 gives the number of sites
at which each of the 31 species were collected. The cosmopolitan
“tadpole snail” Physa
acuta was the most widespread species, collected from a variety
of environments at 123 sites throughout the state. Campeloma decisum was found at 82
generally lotic (or in any case sandy) sites statewide, Lymnaea columella was collected in
48 primarily lentic habitats, and Laevapex
fuscus also appeared at 48 sites, on plant matter and woody
debris.
Among the more interesting findings of the present survey is the
apparent independence of freshwater gastropod distribution and river
drainage. Individual examination of the range maps for all
species collected in this study does not reveal a single instance where
a species seems constrained to a river system or set of
tributaries. Rather, the distributions of many elements of the
freshwater gastropod fauna of South Carolina leave one with the
impression that, at a regional scale, the most important factor is
climate and topography.
The distributions of Goniobasis
proxima and Ferrissia
rivularis seem closely correlated to the Blue Ridge
Ecoregion. These two species may range into the upper
Piedmont, but are entirely absent from the Coastal Plain. Goniobasis proxima and F. rivularis seem especially common
in well-oxygenated rivers and streams with good flows of
well-oxygenated water. The environment need not be rich or
productive.
Characteristic of the Piedmont Ecoregion are Goniobasis
catenaria catenaria, Helisoma anceps, and (perhaps) Somatogyrus
virginicus.
These species seem to prefer lotic environments – Goniobasis and Somatogyrus are especially
associated
with rock substrate – and waters that are at least moderately
productive. Judging from its (currently fragmented) distribution,
it is my suspicion that G. catenaria
and may have been especially impacted by sedimentation from
agricultural development in South Carolina.
Goniobasis
catenaria dislocata
appears to be restricted to rivers and streams of the Southeastern
Plains Ecoregion. It does not require rocky substrate, but is
often found clinging to woody debris, or grazing on sandy substrate in
the eddys.
Helisoma
trivolvis seems to be
found throughout the three ecoregions that comprise the Coastal Plain
province. And characteristic of the Middle Atlantic Coastal
Plain Ecoregion are Viviparus
intertextus, Physa species A,
and the two
Amnicola
species. All
five of these species seem most common in lentic habitats with dark
waters, high in dissolved organics although not (necessarily)
acidic. Viviparus
intertextus and Physa species
A appear especially adapted to swamps –
rich but shallow and possibly ephemeral habitats near the coast.
In summary, the freshwater gastropod fauna of South Carolina includes a
small set of species of statewide range and a rather larger set of
species showing distributions apparently related to climate and
topography. South Carolina also includes a set of species with
limited or local distributions. These will be reviewed in the
section on conservation recommendations.
Robert T. Dillon, Jr.
Department of Biology, College of
Charleston
Charleston, SC 29424
P: 843.953.8087
F: 843.953.5453