![]()
<< Back :: Virginia :: North Carolina :: South Carolina :: Georgia :: FWGNA Home ::
> Physa pomilia Conrad 1834
"Physella heterostropha pomilia"
> Habitat & distribution
This species was incorrectly synonymized under P. heterostropha by
George Te (in Burch). Te did recognize the pomilia subspecies hendersoni as
distinct, however, and suggested a large range – throughout the southeastern
United States up to West Virginia, Tennessee, and Missouri. It seems more
likely that the range of true P. pomilia is more restricted. In southern Atlantic drainages it is presently confirmed only from scattered slow-moving rivers
in the coastal plain. The species certainly extends
through the southeast as far as Alabama, but confusion with P. acuta is very likely. It is typically
found on emergent vegetation and debris in quiet backwaters.
> Ecology & Life
History
Our laboratory cultures of P. pomilia reach
maturity only 5 – 6 weeks post hatch, and shell length of only 5 – 6
mm. This is about two weeks earlier and 1 – 2 mm smaller than typical P.
acuta raised under similar conditions.
> Taxonomy & Systematics
Although outwardly quite similar to P. acuta, sequence data and penial
morphology both confirm that P. pomilia
is distinct (Wethington 2004a, Wethington & Lydeard 2007). Our
laboratory mating experiments (Dillon et al. 2007) have returned evidence
of both premating and postmating reproductive isolation between acuta and pomilia as
well.
The taxonomic history of P. pomilia is a long and checkered one. Conrad originally described P.
pomilia from Randons Creek near Claiborne, Alabama. Clench
(1925) described a subspecies, P. pomilia hendersoni, from Yemassee,
Beaufort County, South Carolina. George Te (1978) synonymized pomilia under heterostropha and
raised hendersoni to the rank of full species. It
was this Te classification of the Physidae that was adopted by Burch in his
influential (1980, 1982) monograph of the North American freshwater snails.
Dillon et al. (2002)
showed, however, that P. heterostropha is a synonym of the cosmopolitan P.
acuta. So in the previous (3/04) version of this
web site, I recognized three physids in South Carolina: P. acuta, P.
hendersoni, and the undescribed species A. But Dillon, Robinson & Wethington (2007) have recently
completed a series of mate choice tests and no-choice breeding studies
confirming Clench’s (1925) impression that hendersoni populations
from Yemassee are not reproductively isolated from P. pomilia collected
at its Alabama type locality. Our South Carolina
populations are at best subspecies of P. pomilia.
For notes regarding the placement of pomilia in the genus Physa, rather than Physella, see my essay of 12Oct07 below.
> Essay
The phylogenetic analysis of Wethington & Lydeard (2007)
prompted me to review the systematics of the Physidae on 12Oct07.
> Maps of Physa distribution
Click the small map to enlarge
it, or download the state-specific PDFs
North Carolina (PDF)
South Carolina (PDF)
Georgia (PDF)
Robert T. Dillon, Jr.
Department of Biology, College of Charleston
Charleston, SC 29424
P: 843.953.8087
F: 843.953.5453