Visit our 2004 Accreditation Site

Institutional Report - Standard 4

 

Standard 4: Diversity

The unit designs, implements, and evaluates curriculum and experiences for candidates to acquire and apply the knowledge, skills, and dispositions necessary to help all students learn. These experiences include working with diverse higher education and school faculty, diverse candidates, and diverse students in P-12 schools.

back to top

 

divider

 

Design, Implementation, and Evaluation of Curriculum and Experiences

Our commitment to diversity is threaded through the conceptual framework and guides course content, field placements, clinical practice, candidate assessment, and capstone experiences. A commitment to learning for ALL students is an important strand in each of the Elements of Teacher Competency (ETC). In order to understand and value the learner (ETC 1), candidates must recognize, value and build upon the myriad differences that characterize P-12 students. In order to know what and how to teach and assess and how to create an environment in which learning occurs (ETC 2), candidates must be able to identify and use materials that present multiple perspectives and offer students insights into different cultures and ways of life; they must seek out and use multiple teaching and assessment strategies, and establish an equitable and inclusive learning environment that encourages and fosters expression of multiple perspectives and ideas. In order to understand themselves as professionals (ETC 3), candidates must embody all of the beliefs and values that are reflected in the dispositions identified by the School of Education. For initial candidates this involves believing that all students can learn, respecting individual differences, and being sensitive to community and cultural contexts. For advanced candidates, this involves advocating for all students and helping to create environments in schools and communities where diverse voices are heard and respected.

The unit designs, implements, and evaluates curriculum, and experiences for initial and advanced candidates to acquire, enhance, and apply the knowledge, skills, and dispositions necessary to help all students learn. Our slogan, Making the Teaching and Learning Connection, reflects our commitment to preparing candidates to support learning for ALL students. It frames the conceptual understanding of how knowledge, skills, and dispositions related to diversity are integrated in our conceptual framework, impacting on initial and advanced programs’ curriculum, field experiences, and assessments. Table 4.1 describes specific knowledge, skills, and dispositions related to diversity that we expect all candidates to develop and/or enhance. Initial candidates develop these at a competent level by the end of their program; advanced candidates build on their knowledge and experience to develop proficiencies that help them become advocates for all children.

Table 4.1
Knowledge, Skills, and Dispositions Related to Diversity

Conceptual Framework Diversity-specific knowledge, skills or dispositions
Understand and value the learner
Standard I. Evidence theoretical and practical understanding of the ways learners develop
  • Ability to identify and teach to developmental differences
  • Uses understanding of social and cultural factors influencing development to meet each student's needs
Know what and how to teach and assess and how to create an environment in which learning occurs
Standard II. Demonstrate understanding and application of the critical attributes and pedagogy of the major content areas
  • Ability to identify and use diverse culturally sensitive and stimulating curriculum
Standard III. Evidence a variety of strategies that optimize student learning
  • Ability to differentiate instruction for all students
  • Ability to create an environment that challenges all students
Standard VI. Demonstrate an understanding of the continuous nature of assessment and its role in facilitating learning
  • Ability to develop and administer multiple forms of assessment
  • Ability to identify bias in assessments
Understand self as a professional
Standard V. Communicate effectively with students, parents, colleagues, and the community
  • Use understanding of the interaction between language and culture to communicate effectively with all
  • Ability to communicate appropriately in a wide variety of settings
Standard VII. Show an understanding of the culture and organization of schools and school systems and their connection to the larger society
  • Use understanding of the culture of the students' community to effectively teach all students
Disposition - Belief that all students can learn
  • Sets high expectations for all students
  • Differentiates instruction so all students learn
Disposition - Value and respect individual differences
  • Differentiates instruction
  • Identifies interests, strengths, and challenges for all students
Disposition - Sensitivity to community and cultural context
  • Understands the relationship between culture and learning
  • Builds on strengths of students' culture and community

Candidates in initial and advanced programs develop an awareness of the importance of diversity in teaching and learning through lectures, discussion, activities, and assignments in courses and field experiences. In initial program courses, we expect that candidates enter programs with some awareness of diversity gained through their experience and in general education courses (especially through required courses in anthropology, sociology or psychology, and foreign languages), but to have limited understanding of how diversity is manifested in the classroom. Through professional courses, this awareness develops as well as the ability to apply knowledge of diversity to successfully teach all students. Our expectation in advanced programs is that candidates enter programs with experience and knowledge of diversity in the classroom, but they need to develop more sophisticated awareness of how diversity impacts classrooms, schools, and the community. The attached Developing Awareness of Diversity provides examples of opportunities candidates have to develop and enhance their awareness of diversity in classrooms, schools, and the community.

Additional courses and experiences provide an opportunity for initial candidates to develop and advanced candidates to enhance the knowledge, skills, and dispositions needed to adapt instruction and services to diverse students. The attached Adapting to Diversity describes how candidates use their knowledge, skills, and dispositions to address diversity in what and how they teach and assess and how the establish an environment in which learning occurs.

Through coursework, field experiences, and clinical practice, candidates in initial programs have multiple opportunities to demonstrate that they have developed the knowledge, skills and dispositions necessary to help all students learn. In program reports submitted to professional organizations, each program has already demonstrated candidates’ ability to work with diverse learners, but we also track candidate performance in relation to diversity at the unit level. This is done through electronic portfolios that were initiated in fall 2003. Candidates entering the program that semester are the first to be introduced to this system, although some programs have been using other types of portfolios prior to the decision to use electronic portfolios. Portfolios are evaluated at the unit level at UAP 2 (prior to clinical practice) and UAP 3 (at completion of clinical practice) and most programs evaluate them every semester. Using the Unit Portfolio Assessment programs ensure that candidates’ portfolios meet program standards and are consistent with the conceptual framework. In addition, the template used to build a portfolio mirrors the conceptual framework’s Elements of Teacher Competency. Since each of the Elements of Teacher Competency have strands related to diversity, the aggregate scores for each Element are listed in Table 4.2 below.

Table 4.2
Candidate Portfolio Evidence Related to Diversity*

Element of Teacher Competency
UAP 2 (admission to clinical practice) N=25**
UAP 3 (recommendation for certification) N=36
ETC1: Understanding and valuing the learner.
2.98
2.81
ETC2: Knowing what and how to teach and assess and how to create an environment in which learning occurs.
2.98
2.79
ETC3: Understanding self as a professional
3.0
2.81

* Portfolios are rated on a 4 point scale. 3 = exceeds standard, 2 = meets standard, 1 = below standard, 0 = unacceptable.
** The number of entries at UAP2 is small because the largest programs (early childhood and elementary) waited to initiate portfolios at UAP2 until the first cohort of candidates entered the revised programs (see Table 1). The special education and physical education programs pilot tested using portfolios to collect and reflect upon evidence. All other programs began using portfolios in 2003-2004.

It is clear from analysis of candidate performance in clinical practice that they plan for diverse learners, can adjust teaching to needs of students, and are competent in planning for, assessing, and using assessment data. As Table 4.3 illustrates, candidates assess student learning through formal and informal assessments. They plan and use authentic assessments; they construct tests that are reasonable in difficulty and length, and they are skilled at observation and questioning.

Table 4.3
Candidate Performance on ADEPT Related to Assessment of Student Learning*

ADEPT PDs related to assessment of student learning Mean scores and number of candidates by academic year
  2004 n=111 2003 n=169 2002 n=120 2001 n=26
PD 1.2 in long range planning determine the ability, developmental levels, background and needs of the students 2.93 2.95 2.95 3.0
PD 1.12 in long range plan, plan procedures for routinely communicating with parents 2.87 2.95 2.95 3.0
PD 1.13 periodically evaluate and revise the long range plan based on student performance 2.88 3.13 2.94 2.69
PD 2.4 in short range plan, plan instructional strategies which are matched to the needs of students 2.90 2.96 2.96 2.92
PD 3.1 plan and schedule a variety of authentic assessments of student progress 2.85 2.92 2.93 2.81
PD 3.2 use observations, questioning, and other appropriate techniques to monitor progress 2.94 2.97 2.98 2.92
PD 3.3 plan for assessments that actually measure objectives and material presented 2.95 2.94 2.98 2.88
PD 3.4 construct tests which are reasonable in length and difficulty 2.89 2.93 2.92 2.85
PD 3.5 provide opportunities for student self-evaluations 2.82 2.92 2.86 2.77
PD 3.6 demonstrate the ability to maintain organized records 2.93 2.95 2.96 2.85
PD 3.7 analyze assessment results to determine the need for further instruction 2.88 2.95 2.96 2.88
PD 3.8 analyze behavior based on knowledge of child development and learning 2.86 2.96 2.96 2.88
PD 5.3 use varied instructional strategies that address the individual needs of the student 2.86 2.95 2.92 2.88
PD 5.7 demonstrate ability to adjust instruction to a variety of circumstances 2.92 2.96 2.95 3.0
PD 7.1 observe student progress 2.96 2.97 2.99 2.92
PD 7.2 use appropriate questioning techniques 2.90 2.96 2.96 2.96
PD 7.3 assess completed student work 2.97 2.95 2.99 2.96

* Data derived from EDA-SYS system. See ADEPT Performance Dimension Analysis


Employer surveys and graduate surveys completed by alumni graduating between 1998 and 2002 and their employers (see Feedback from Candidates, Graduates, and Employers) provide follow-up data on candidates’ ability to help all students learn. The survey was designed to obtain information on graduate performance in relation to the three Elements of Teacher Competency using wording similar to that in the ADEPT PDs. Both surveys used a rating scale of competent (5), developing competent (3), needs improvement (1), or never demonstrates (0). Table 4.4 provides evidence that both employers and graduates believe that College of Charleston graduates have the characteristics necessary to have a positive effect on student learning.

Table 4.4
Employer and Graduate Survey: Student Learning for Teacher Candidates

Criteria Employers Graduates
Plans, develops, and schedules a variety of authentic assessments of student progress. B.S. n=21 M.A.T. n=4 B.S. n=85 M.A.T. n=17
4.5
4.5
4.31
4.41
Uses observations, questioning, and other appropriate techniques to monitor student progress.
4.6
4.6
4.73
4.88
Analyzes assessment results to determine the need for further instruction.
4.5
4.5
4.53
4.65
Plans for assessments that actually measure objectives and material presented.
4.4
4
4.61
4.88
Provides opportunities for student self-evaluations.
4.2
4.6
3.8
3.24
Uses long and short range plans that takes into consideration the ability, developmental levels, background, and needs of the students.
4.6
5
4.53
4.65
Establishes and maintains high expectations for students.
4.6
4.6
4.88
4.77
Uses varied instructional strategies that are appropriate for the content, skills, and individual needs of the student.
4.6
4.2
4.70
4.41
Uses varied instructional strategies that actively engage students.
4.5
5
4.63
4.77
Demonstrates ability to adjust instruction to a variety of circumstances.
4.6
4.6
4.73
4.65

The above describes the skills and knowledge candidates develop that help them have a positive effect on all students’ learning. Dispositions are also critical to ensuring that candidates meet the needs of every student in their classroom. Several of the dispositions assessed as candidates develop are critical to helping all students learn. These dispositions are assessed as candidates progress through the program and by candidates and employers 2-5 years after completion of programs. Table 4.5 summarizes mean scores on assessments of dispositions that relate to student learning for all students and illustrates that scores are consistently high and improve over time.

Table 4.5
Dispositions Related to Diversity: 2003-2004

Disposition Mean score at admission (UAP1) N=1426* Mean score prior to clinical practice (UAP2) N=141** Mean score at end of clinical practice (UAP3) N=199** Mean score 2 years and 5 years (UAP4&5***) N=102
Belief that all students can learn.
4.76
4.83
4.89
4.92
Value and respect individual differences.
4.74
4.86
4.90
4.94
Value positive human interactions.
4.68
4.34
4.94
4.98

* Includes assessments from EDFS 201 instructor, person knowledgeable of candidates’ work with children/youth, and an arts/sciences faculty member
** Includes assessments from supervising higher education and school faculty members
*** Includes candidates graduating between 1998 and 2002.

In designing and revising M.Ed. programs we determined that advanced candidates demonstrate evidence that they are competent teachers, as demonstrated by holding a teaching certificate in the program area7. The Elementary M.Ed. and Early Childhood M.Ed. programs require evidence of at least one year of teaching prior to admission to the program so that candidates can draw on actual teaching experience in their advanced courses. Table 4.6 illustrates how each of the M.Ed. programs assesses candidates’ enhanced ability to teach and advocate for diverse students.

Table 4.6
Advanced Program Assessment of Candidates’ Ability to Teach and Advocate for Diverse Students

Advanced Program Assessment Results
Early Childhood Candidates perform well in EDFS 710: Introduction to Exceptional Children and EDFS 718: Trends and Issues in Special Education demonstrating that they have a thorough knowledge of issues surrounding exceptional children. In EDEE 625: Interdisciplinary Themes, they perform well on a project to design units meeting individual needs of diverse students.
Elementary Candidate performance in EDEE 643: Elementary School Math is strong, indicating that they understand differences in how students learn math. They also perform well on a curriculum impact paper examining how curriculum affects diverse learners (EDEE 667: Curriculum Design). In EDEE 634: Trends and Issues in Elementary Education they perform well on a family involvement project focused on diverse families.
Special Education The entire special education advanced degree is devoted to increasing candidates' ability to teach diverse students and to become more effective advocates. EDFS 713: The Special Educator as Consultant involves candidates in an advocacy project.
Languages LALE 602: Advanced Methods of Second Language Teaching and all of the ESOL courses ensure that candidates have the knowledge and skills needed to teach culturally and linguistically diverse students.
Science and Math for Teachers In EDFS 632: Educational Psychology and EDFS: Nature of Science, Mathematics, and Science/Mathematics Education candidates conduct action research projects that analyze influences on student achievement variation.
Middle Level (the first cohort of candidates will begin coursework in fall 2005) In EDEE 684 candidates teach three lessons specifically designed during the course to meet the needs of diverse students. One lesson is observed by the higher education faculty member, one by a fellow candidate, and one by an administrator. Candidates write detailed reflections on the lessons based on their own perceptions and on the observation feedback.

 

back to top

 

 

Experiences Working with Diverse Faculty

Candidates have an opportunity to interact with a diverse college faculty and with teachers from a wide range of backgrounds. As illustrated in Table 4.7, the School of Education faculty teaching in both initial and advanced programs is diverse and includes members with exceptionalities. To gain a more complete understanding of faculty diversity, the School of Education surveyed faculty on their diversity; 43 faculty members (including three members of PEHD who are not in the teacher education program) completed the survey at a faculty meeting on May 14, 2004.

Table 4.7
Self Reported Data School of Education Higher Education Faculty Diversity Study

Question Results
Program Level Taught Initial 8 / 20.5%
Advanced 1 / 2.6%
Both 25/ 58.1%
NR 9 /23.1%
Please list any ethnic heritage with which you have a sense of belonging or identification. 34 / 79% American 2 /4.6% Canadian
7 / 16.2% African 1 / 2.3% Hispanic
8 / 18.6% English 1 / 2.3% South Asian
1 / 2.3% Jewish 3 / 6.9% Native American
4 / 9.3% German 8 / 18.6% Irish
1 / 2.3% Italian 1 / 2.3% Greek
1 / 2.3% NR
10 / 23.2% Other. Mkamba, Russian, Polish, Southern, Ukrainian, Scandinavian, French, Scottish, Appalachian, Dutch
Childhood Socioeconomic Status 13 / 30.2% Low 29 / 67.4% Middle
2 / 4.6% High  
Current Socioeconomic Status 0 / 0 Low 37 / 86% Middle
4 / 9.3% High 1/ 2.3% NR
Gender 13 / 30.2% Male 29 / 67.4% Female
Exceptionalities (Please list) 3/ 6.9% Hearing Impaired 1/ 2.3% Learning Disability
3/ 6.9% Visually Impaired 2 / 4.6% Mobility Impairment
4 / 9.3% Orthopedic Disability 31 /72% NR
6 / 13.9% Other. Please list: Gifted and Talented, Gifted, Gifted in Art, ADD (2), Epilepsy
Language 42/ 97.6% English 2/ 4.6% French
2 / 4.6% Spanish 1 / 2.3% Multi-lingual
1 / 2.3% Other  
Religion 10 / 25% Protestant 1 / 2.5% Baptist
6 / 10% Catholic 6 / 15% Methodist
1 / 2.5% Greek Orthodox 3 / 7.5% Presbyterian
1 / 2.5% Atheist 8 / 20% Agnostic or not religious (not anti-religion)
8 / 18.6% Other. Please list: Pentecostal, Quaker, Episcopal, Quaker, Personal, Non-Denominational, Bahai, Anglican
Sexual Orientation 38 / 88.3% Heterosexual 5 / 11.6% Gay/Lesbian
Geographic Area 10 / 23.2% Rural (Includes living in small town) 24 / 55.8% Suburban
9 / 20.9% Urban

Table 4.8 below provides quantitative date drawn from the recent AACTE report documenting trend data for unit faculty who teach education candidates. In fall 2003, there were 87 full-time and part-time higher education faculty members in the unit. Ten (11.49%) were minorities: eight African-American, one Asian/Pacific Islander, and one Hispanic. Data on the diversity of school faculty who work with College of Charleston candidates are not available, but of the 6,322 teachers in Charleston, Berkeley, and Dorchester Two school districts, 16% are male, and 84% are female; 83% are White, 16% African American, and 1% are other minorities. This is consistent with a report from the South Carolina State Department of Education reports that found in 2001-2002, 17% of teachers were male; 81.5% were female, and 1.5% provided no report. Of these teachers, 16.6% were African American; 10.0% reported being other minority; 76.1% reported being White, and 6.4% gave no response.

Table 4.8
Diverse Groups Represented by the College of Charleston, School of Education and School Faculty: 2003

Characteristics College of Charleston N=469 Full time faculty N=44 Part time faculty N=43 School faculty (Tri-County Average) N=6,322
Male 283/60.3% 12/27.3% 12/28% 16%
Female 186/39.6% 32/72.7% 31/72% 84%
Nonresident alien 13/2.7% 0/0 0/0 n/a
Native American n/a 0/0 0/0 n/a
African American 22/4.7% 6/13.6% 2/5% 16%
Asian/Pacific Islander 7/1.5% 0/0 1/2% n/a
Hispanic 15/3.2% 1/1% 0/0 n/a
White 412/87.8% 37/84% 40/93% 83%
Other n/a n/a 0/0 10%

* Includes PEHD faculty who teach outside the teacher education program.

School of Education faculty members remain actively involved in public schools in the Charleston area. Given that most of these schools are highly diverse, experience working with diverse P-12 students is extensive. Additionally, most faculty members came to the College of Charleston with experience teaching diverse students. Faculty responses to the request to describe how their diversity contributes to candidates being prepared to teach all P-12 students is summarized in Faculty Diversity Self-Report and focuses largely on how teaching in diverse settings affected them and their teaching.

President Lee Higdon in November of 2003 established the College of Charleston Diversity Council as a focal point for discussion of diversity issues. The College Diversity Council is charged with developing a plan that will address issues in both the Fourth Century Initiative and Strategic Plan that will effectively communicate the educational significance associated with preparing candidates for a diverse society and increasing faculty and student diversity. The Faculty Senate supports the Administration’s strong commitment to faculty diversity is evidenced in its November 2003 endorsement of a resolution concerning the importance of faculty diversity and hiring.

The School of Education frames its goal of increasing faculty diversity in several ways. Our faculty’s diversity should reflect the surrounding community, specifically Charleston and its surrounding region. While diversity in South Carolina is generally equated to African-Americans, both the College and the School of Education view diversity more broadly (in keeping with NCATE’s definition of diversity). School of Education priorities identified in recruiting and hiring candidates for faculty positions are foremost, that the candidate is highly qualified and brings gender and ethnic diversity.

Within the School of Education, the following ongoing efforts have improved the diversity and retention of our faculty.

  • The Faculty Recruitment and Retention Committee SOE Policies and Procedures Manual is a standing committee and consists of the Dean, department chairs, the College’s Director of Human Resources and Minority Affairs, and departmental representatives who are typically chairs of active searches.
  • Restructured in 1999, the Faculty Recruitment and Retention Committee (SOE Faculty Recruitment and Retention Plan) has developed a course of action that employs several strategies specifically aimed at continuing to diversify our faculty. The first strategy is active recruitment. This strategy supplements traditional approaches in identifying faculty candidates, involves all School of Education faculty in recruitment, connects School of Education efforts to diversify with campus-wide efforts, and, as a standing committee, sets objectives for diversity efforts and monitors progress annually.
  • As a Recruitment Team, the committee has specified tasks to employ this active recruitment, e.g., project faculty needs for a three- year period; establish measurable goals, both long- and short-term for desired faculty diversity; track and evaluate work of search committees; and develop plans for involvement of all faculty in recruitment.
  • Related to recruitment and retention are salary issues. A salary study conducted by a School of Education ad hoc committee in 2000-01 and a College of Charleston committee’s study (see Faculty Compensation Study) provide recommendations to the president which are in the process of implementation and will strengthen our ability to recruit and retain highly qualified, diverse candidates.

Results of these efforts include implementation of 1) networking and 2) use of targets of opportunity.

Networking. The School of Education has accessed Holmes Scholar alumnae through faculty member Dr. Angela Cozart. We have connected with Ph.D. Programs with significant numbers of minority students. Professional relations with minority faculty and administrators in the area have provided networks. Recruiting resources are being compiled. Identification of publications used to recruit minority candidates and ongoing development of lists to advertise positions that will enable diverse recruitment is underway.

Target of opportunity slots. The use of open-ended recruitment procedures in conjunction with careful projections of future needs has allowed the School of Education to bring in diverse candidates who qualify for a position that is not yet open or for a position that can be created through flexible use of talents and expertise. An example of this strategy is the joint search of the History Department and the Foundations, Secondary, and Specializations in Education Departments for a faculty member who will teach in history and secondary education.

back to top

 

 

Experiences Working with Diverse Candidates

As part of its mission statement, The College of Charleston has made the commitment to enroll a broadly diverse student body. This commitment requires the college to fund several agencies on and off campus, specifically dedicated to increasing student diversity and exposing students to diverse cultures. Included among these are the Avery Research Center for African American History and Culture, the Office of Intercultural Programs at the College, and the Office of International Education and Programs. These agencies offer a variety of campus-wide programs and services designed to enhance and support all facets of student life and academic success. SPECTRA, designed to assist incoming minority students make a smooth transition from high school to college, is one especially effective program. SPECTRA participants enroll in two summer school courses which, upon successful completion, will apply toward their baccalaureate degree. In addition to the academic benefits, SPECTRA sponsors socially and culturally enriching activities. An integral component of their mission includes campus education and programming for the celebration of diversity. The Upward Bound Program is another successful program sponsored by the College of Charleston. Established in 1975, it is a college preparatory program designed to generate in its participants the skills and motivation necessary for success in education beyond high school. The Upward Bound Program provides special academic and cultural opportunities for a limited number of high school sophomores, juniors and seniors who have expressed an interest in pursuing a post-secondary education and who have demonstrated the potential to succeed in post-secondary education.

In addition, student organizations celebrating diversity are also supported at the College of Charleston. These organizations include the Asian American Student Union, the Black Student Union, the Atheist and Humanists Alliance, the International Club, Lambda, the Student Union for Minority Affairs, Russian Studies, and the Women’s Forum.

The College also supports and maintains several majors and minors that encourage students to examine diverse cultural groups. Among these are areas of study that include African Studies, African American Studies, Jewish Studies, and Latin American and Caribbean Studies. The College also maintains the Center for Disability Services to assist individuals who have disabilities, in accordance with both the Americans with Disabilities Act, and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act and to inform the student body about issues related to disabilities.

As Tables 4.9 and 4.10 illustrate, efforts to increase student diversity have been highly successful. The African American population for the College of Charleston increased slightly (from 8 to 9% of the total population) while it increased from 7 to 14% within the School of Education. This increase is strong support for the recruitment efforts undertaken by the School of Education in the last ten years. The School of Education candidate population is becoming more representative of the region (35.4% African American in Charleston County) and the state (29.6% African American) (see American Community Survey Profile 2002).

Table 4.9
Ethnic Composition of College of Charleston Student Population 1993 - 2003

Ethnic Group Undergraduate Graduate Total
  1993 2003 1993 2003 1993 2003
Non-Resident Alien 162/2.0% 224/2% 18/1% 36/2% 180/2% 260/2%
African American 523/6% 828/8% 311/12% 211/12% 834/8% 1039/9%
American Indian/Alaskan 22/0% 28/0% 3/0% 1/0% 25/0% 29/0%
Pacific Islander/Asian 140/2% 145/1% 7/0% 12/1% 147/1% 157/1%
Hispanic 64/1% 138/1% 1/0% 18/1% 65/1% 156/1%
White 7109/88% 8223/84% 2170/86% 1415/83% 9279/88% 9638/84%
Unreported 31/0% 238/2% 5/0% 19/1% 36/0% 257/2%
Total Headcount 8051 9824 2515 1712 10566 11536

Table 4.10
Ethnic Composition of School of Education Candidate Population 1993 - 2003

Ethnic Group Undergraduate M.A.T. M.Ed.
  1993 2003 1993 2003 1993 2003
Non-Resident Alien
5/1%
4/1%
0/0.0%
1/0.7%
0/0%
0/0.0%
African American
50/6%
116/17%
8/6.2%
2/1.4%
8/11.0%
8/10.4%
American Indian/Alaskan
2/0%
2/0%
0/0.0%
0/0.0%
0/0.0%
0/0.0%
Pacific Islander/Asian
7/1%
13/2%
0/0.0%
1/0.7%
1/1.4%
1/1.3%
Hispanic
6/1%
4/1%
0/0.0%
1/0.7%
0/0.0%
0/0.0%
White
707/91%
541/78%
121/93.1%
138/96.5%
64/87.7%
68/88.3%
Unreported
0/0%
13/2%
1/0.8%
0/0.0%
0/0.0%
0/0.0%
Total Headcount
777
693
130
143
73
77

The School of Education actively recruits and maintains candidates of widely diverse backgrounds. We affirm and embrace diversity, and our commitment to this concept through preparing initial and advanced candidates who experience and work with students from widely diverse backgrounds, including differences in race, socioeconomic status, sexual orientation and various exceptionalities. These efforts include recruitment activities designed to attract high school students. Two such programs that encourage diversity on campus are the Teacher Cadet Program, and the Teaching Fellows Program. Our academic programs have specifically been designed to enhance and support each candidate’s academic and extra-curricular accomplishments, while emphasizing a celebration of our cultural diversity.

The School of Education instituted a Committee on Diversity in 1998 that has remained active in College of Charleston and School of Education efforts to recruit and retain diverse candidates. In keeping with federal mandates, scholarships have not been specifically earmarked for minority candidates. However, both the State of South Carolina Commission on Higher Education and the College of Charleston strongly encourage people of diverse backgrounds to apply for scholarships. Additionally, the School of Education employs a graduate student assistant whose sole responsibility is to recruit minority students for our various programs. This student is currently working with the college’s recruitment and marketing department planning innovative strategies for the recruitment of minority graduate students.

back to top

 

 

Experiences Working with Diverse Students in P–12 Schools

Candidates in initial programs engage in a series of field experiences culminating in a semester of clinical practice. The field experiences are developmental, providing candidates a series of field experiences that build upon previous field experiences prior to clinical practice. By completing a series of field experiences and clinical practice, candidates experience a diversity of placements – primarily middle class suburban, low income urban and/or rural, and settings with mixed populations. In these settings candidates work with populations of diverse students and with students with exceptionalities. Initial candidates are placed in schools in three school districts. Advanced candidates are typically working in schools in the tri-county area or are placed in field experiences in schools serving diverse populations and in classrooms with exceptional students. All these settings have mainstreamed or inclusion experiences with children with mild disabilities. Table 4.11 provides basic demographic information on the diversity in the districts.

Table 4.11
Demographics of Field Experience and Clinical Practice Placement Sites*

District
Characteristics
Student Population
Schools
Berkeley County School District Urban-fringe suburban and rural. 37 schools and 28,306 students. 59,1% Caucasian; 36.3% African American; 4.6% Latino and Other. 50.1% eligible for free or reduced lunch 2 primary schools 15 elementary schools 3 intermediate schools 10 middle schools 6 high schools 1 alternative school (grades 6-12)
Charleston County School District Mid-size central city, suburban, rural. 73 schools and 43,372 students. 38.9% Caucasian; 57.4% African American; 3.6% Latino and Other. 52.2% eligible for free or reduced lunch 45 elementary schools 13 middle schools 8 high schools 12 magnet schools 5 charter schools
Dorchester School District Two Urban-fringe suburban. 17 schools and 17,004 students. 68.4% Caucasian; 28.4% African American; 3.2% Latino and Other 28.7% eligible for free or reduced lunch. 9 elementary schools 5 middle schools 2 high schools 1 community school

* Sources: Berkeley County School District; Charleston County School District; Dorchester School District Two.

 

back to top

 

 
7 The SMFT and Languages programs do not require certification – Special Education has a certification track in its M.Ed. program. Candidates who are not teaching are required to be in field settings with diverse and/or exceptional students.

back to the report

 

 

Proceed to Institutional Report - Standard 5

 

| Contact Us | Accreditation Home | School of Education | Departments | Updated: 27 September 2004 |