ARGUS SOTA Faculty and Staff Newsletter Issue 3 March/April 2002Music
Table of Contents
 
Art History  
Arts Management  
Halsey Gallery  
Historic Preservation and Community Planning
 
Music
 
Studio Art
 
Theatre
 
Other News
 
Cover Page
 
Back Issues
 
Home
 

School of the Arts College of Charleston



College of Charleston
 
 

Page 2

Maves’ CD The Piano Sonatas

 

Maves’ CD The Piano Sonatas received a glowing review on Musicweb

http://www.musicweb.uk.net/classrev/2002/Apr02/Maves.htm

David MAVES
The Piano Sonatas
Max Lifschitz (piano)
Recorded : Recital Hall of SUNY Stony Brook, January 1983 (Sonatas 1 and 2) and Recital Hall of the University at Albany, May 1995 (Sonatas 3 and 4)
NORTH/SOUTH RECORDINGS R 1008 [75:59]

AmazonUS

David Maves’ four piano sonatas span some twenty years of his composing career and thus provide for a good opportunity to assess his musical progress over the years.
The Piano Sonata No.1 (1973) has a somewhat unusual structure and consists in six short sections, of which the first five are best heard as studies in piano writing and piano sound. The final section Finale summarises and amplifies the various, rather disparate elements of the preceding sections. The piano writing here is somewhat more radical and ‘modern’ than in the later sonatas, but never extravagantly so.

The Piano Sonata No.2 (1978) is rather similar to the First in that it is also a multi-sectional piece of which the last section Sonata is some sort of summation of the preceding ones, much in the same way but on a somewhat larger scale than in the First Sonata. The major difference is that the Second Piano Sonata is in fact a theme and variations capped by a larger Finale, and the composer acknowledges Beethoven’s Diabelli Variations as a model. A fairly impressive piece of music, I must say, and a very taxing one, from the pianist’s point of view.
The composer admits that his Piano Sonata No.3 (1993) is a “simple, straightforward Neo-classical sonata”. To some extent this is a fairly apt description of the piece, obviously on a smaller scale than the Second and in a comparatively more traditional idiom, thought I doubt that ‘Neo-classical’ is the right word to describe the music. On the whole, however, the Third Sonata is a quite accessible and enjoyable piece of music well worth having.
In total contrast again, the Piano Sonata No.4 (1994) is on a rather grand scale and is laid-out in four movements, thus roughly adhering to the traditional sonata pattern. The opening movement is full of vitality and grand, brilliant gestures, and must be rather tricky to play. The following Andante is a theme and variations, and is followed by a nervous Scherzo. The Fourth Piano Sonata ends in grand manner, “a gargantuan build-up for its entire length into a big ending”. The Fourth Sonata is an expansive work in the mould of the big romantic sonata, though the music is somewhat more traditional though still clearly 20th Century, and quite demanding, calling for much strength and stamina on the performer’s part.
Maves’ piano sonatas are really fine, beautifully written and very contrasted works. In a way, a composer’s view on 20th Century piano writing in all its diversity while clearly avoiding the more ‘trendy’ gimmicks. Even if parts of the earlier sonatas are somewhat more ‘modern’ in sound, the music is very accessible, often rather demanding but always very rewarding.
Besides being the founder and conductor of the North/South Consonance ensemble, Max Lifschitz is also a brilliant pianist who has the full measure of Maves’ often intricate music. The present recording of the first two sonatas was originally released on OPUS ONE RECORDS and are cleanly transferred here, whereas the recordings of the Third and Fourth Sonatas were made in 1995 and were given a warm, natural piano sound. Well worth investigating.
Hubert Culot
Rob Barnett
Editor Classical Music on the Web
www.musicweb.uk.net <http://www.musicweb.uk.net>
Editor, British Music Society Newsletter

___________________________________________________

South Carolina NATS

Congratulations to C of C Voice Students for superb performances at the South Carolina NATS (The National Association of Teachers of Singing):
Honors Winners (qualifying for Regional Competition):
Junior Women: Kristin Buffkin, Emily McClure, Kristina Riegle
Junior Men: Benji Lee
Sophmore Men: Gilberto Hurtarte
Freshman Women: Merrell Young
Musical Theatre: Jamie Westberry
1st Place Winners:
Sophmore Women: Christina Demos
Junior Women: Emily McClure
___________________________________________________

Southeastern Community College Piano Competition

William Villaverde has won yet another piano competition. Friday, March 15, 2002 he wone 1st prize in the Southeastern Community College Piano Competition in North Carolina.

3rd prize went to Bernard Krafsig and Edward Leonard

All three winners are piano students of Enrique Graf

___________________________________________________


Marco Sartor comes out on top at the 6th Annual Edwin H. & Leigh W. Schadt String Competition.

The classical guitar was featured this year at the annual Schadt String Competition. Three finalists performed at a free public recital at Allentown Symphony Hall. First place went to Marco Sartor for his performance of the Concerto for Guitar and Orchestra by Villa-Lobos. The first place award is $5,000 and a solo performance with the Allentown Symphony Orchestra 2002-2003 subscription series.
___________________________________________________

BEST MUSICAL DIRECTOR


Laura Ball, piano major, was recently recognized as the BEST MUSICAL DIRECTOR by the Critics at the City Paper for her work with “LUCKY STIFF” . Ball is a piano major studying under Robin Zemp. In addition, she studies voice with Margaret Kelly Cook.

 

For comments or sugestions please email gleasond@admin.cofc.edu

Or contact us at:
School of the Arts
College of Charleston
66 George St.
Charleston, SC 29242

(843) 953-6315