English 517:
Contemporary
American Literature
Syllabus / Reading Schedule / Assignments
Dr. Susan Farrell
26 Glebe Street, #205
953-5785
farrells@cofc.edu
Office Hours
MWF 10:00-11:30, W 2-3
and by appointment
Books
--Kurt Vonnegut, Slaughterhouse-5
--Don DeLillo, White Noise
--Ishmael Reed, Mumbo Jumbo
--Tim O'Brien, Going After Cacciato
--Tom Wolfe, The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test
--Norman Mailer, The Executioner's Song
--Toni Morrison, Song of Solomon
--Louise Erdrich, Tracks
--Jane Smiley, A Thousand Acres
--Jonathan Safran Foer, Extremely Loud & Incredibly Close
- Tom Wolfe/Joan Didion essays (available on library electronic reserve and WebCT)
Course Description
This course examines a selection of contemporary American fiction in historic, aesthetic, and social contexts. In other words, we will explore the relationship between contemporary American literature and the world we live in. Topics may include literature and postmodern culture, how aesthetic style may be influenced by social and historical conditions, the blurring of fact and fiction in contemporary literature, and how literature is affected by issues of race, class, and gender. While the range of contemporary American fiction is extremely broad and varied, and impossible to cover in one semester, students will become acquainted with several of the major trends in American literature since 1965. The course is divided into four main units: 1) post W.W.II and postmodernism; 2) new journalism and popular culture; 3) issues of race and gender; and 4) 9/11 aftermath. As students will discover, these categories are not mutually exclusive. They overlap and intersect one another.
Coursework
Required work for the course includes careful reading of all assigned material and active participation in class discussions. Please come to class prepared with questions and comments about the assigned reading for each day--the success of the course depends on your involvement.
Papers, Presentations
Early in the semester, you will choose (or be assigned) one of the books on the syllabus. Your two major papers and your class presentation will revolve around this text. The first paper will be an annotated bibliography that summarizes at least ten outside sources and two critical disagreements surrounding the book. You will present your research findings to the class on the day we discuss the book. Your final annotated bibliography will also be due that day. The second essay is an approximately 15-page research paper which should build on both your own reading of the book and what you discovered in your research. I will expect you to place your reading of the work within a critical context relevant to it. A first draft of your research paper is due 10 days after your annotated bibliography. I will provide more detailed information about papers and presentations well in advance of their due date.
Position Papers
In addition to the two major written assignments (the annotated bibliography and the research paper), I will ask you to write seven short (approximately 500 words) position papers. For each book we read, I'll provide a list of possible topics. Position papers will be due on scheduled days; they will not be accepted late. You may choose which seven papers to write and which to skip.
Note: You may not write one of your position papers on the book that you're writing your research paper on.
Exams
There will be a mid-term and a final exam in the class. I will give you more information about it before the end of the semester.
Grading
| Your final grade will be determined according to these percentages: | Letter grades assigned will have the following numerical values: | |||||
| Position Papers |
15%
|
A+/98
|
B+/88
|
C+/78
|
D+/68
|
|
| Annotated Bibliography |
15%
|
A /95
|
B /85
|
C /75
|
D /65
|
|
| Presentation |
5%
|
A-/92
|
B-/82
|
C-/72
|
D-/62
|
|
| Draft of Research Paper |
5%
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Research Paper |
25%
|
F = 50
|
Paper not turned
in = 0
|
|||
| Mid-Term Exam |
15% |
|||||
| Final Exam |
20%
|
|||||
Go To:
Week |
Date |
Assignment |
Week 1 |
Mon. Aug. 27 |
Course Introduction |
Post W.W.II, Postmodernism |
||
|
Week 2 |
Mon. Sept. 3 |
Slaughterhouse-Five |
|
Week 3 |
Mon. Sept. 10 |
White Noise |
|
Th. Sept. 13 |
Drafts of Sl-5 papers e-mailed to me by midnight |
|
|
Week 4 |
Mon. Sept. 17 |
Mumbo Jumbo |
|
Th. Sept. 20 |
Drafts of White Noise papers e-mailed to me by midnight |
|
|
Week 5 |
Mon. Sept. 24 |
Going After Cacciato |
|
Th. Sept. 27 |
Drafts of Mumbo Jumbo papers e-mailed to me by midnight |
|
New Journalism, Popular Culture |
||
|
Week 6 |
Mon. Oct. 1 |
Wolfe/Didion essays (available library e-reserves) |
|
Th. Oct. 4 |
Drafts of Cacciato papers e-mailed to me by midnight |
|
|
Week 7 |
Mon. Oct. 8 |
The Electric Kool-Aid Acid Test |
|
Week 8 |
Mon. Oct. 15 |
Fall Break |
|
Th. Oct. 18 |
Drafts of Electric Kool-Aid papers e-mailed to me by midnight |
|
|
Week 9 |
Mon. Oct. 22 |
Mid-Term Exam |
|
Week 10 |
Mon. Oct. 29 |
The Executioner's Song |
Race and Gender |
||
|
Week 11 |
Mon. Nov. 5 |
Song of Solomon |
|
Th. Nov. 8 |
Drafts of Executioner's Song papers e-mailed to me by midnight |
|
|
Week 12 |
Mon. Nov. 12 |
Tracks |
|
Th. Nov. 15 |
Drafts of Song of Solomon papers e-mailed to me by midnight |
|
|
Week 13 |
Mon. Nov. 19 |
A Thousand Acres |
|
Th. Nov. 22 |
Drafts of Tracks papers e-mailed to me by midnight |
|
9/11
Aftermath
|
||
|
Week 14 |
Mon. Nov. 26 |
Extremely Loud
and Incredibly Close |
|
Th. Nov. 29 |
Drafts of A Thousand Acres papers e-mailed to me by midnight |
|
|
Week 15 |
Mon. Dec. 3 |
--Class Wrap-Up; Discuss Final Exam |
|
Final Papers Due: Wednesday, Dec. 5 (in my office by 5:00) |
||
|
Final Exam: Monday, December 10, 4-7 p.m. |
||
Go To:
Position Papers / Annotated Bibliography / Research Paper
Go To:
Your position papers should be approximately 500
words (they should be no more
than two typed pages), so you'll have to think carefully about what you
want to say and make every word count. You're required to turn in
7 position papers over the course of the semester. Remember that late
position papers are not accepted. You may either respond to one
of the suggested topics or come up with your own if you'd prefer.
Note: You may not write one of your position papers on the book that you're writing your research paper on.
Click on the book to see specific topics for each.
Possible Topics:
--Why do you think Vonnegut chooses to begin with the very
self-reflective first chapter that explains his difficulties writing
the book? What does he gain by such an opening chapter; what do
you think he's trying to accomplish here?
--Do you believe this is an anti-war book or not? Vonnegut
concedes in the opening chapter that trying to stop wars is like trying
to stop glaciers. Is he a fatalist, as some critics have charged,
or does he think change is possible?
--Comment on the book's style. What makes it unique,
interesting? Does the style seem to underscore the content?
Or does it detract from the content?
--What are we supposed to think about the Tralfamadorians and their
world-view? Does Vonnegut believe (and want us to believe) that the
Tralfamadorian philosophy of life is more sane and reasonable
than that of earthlings? Or do you believe that Vonnegut
satirizes the Tralfamadorian view--that he presents it ironically?
Possible Topics:
--What do you think the "white noise" of the title refers
to? Where in the book itself do we see this white noise
manifested? What does the white noise suggest about contemporary
American culture?
--Do you think DeLillo critiques or appreciates our media-obsessed,
consumerist society? Or does his vision involve a more complicated
mixture of the two? Cite particular scenes, instances in the book
to support your view.
--Choose a particular supporting character (Heinrich, Denise, Stephie,
Wilder, Murray Jay Siskind, Babette, Orest Mercator, etc.) and discuss
what role this character seems to play in the book.
--Look one of these particular scenes in the book and provide a close
reading of what you think is going on here:
1) The scene beginning in Chapter 39 when Jack confronts Willie
Mink.
2) The scene at the hospital with the German nuns.
3) The scene at the very beginning of Chapter 40, in which Wilder
rides his tricycle across the highway.
Possible Topics:
--What do you think "Jes Grew" is?
--What do you think Reed is saying about the Western view of art?
Why are museums called "centers of art detention"? Does he
imagine a different kind of art? How does the style of the novel
challenge traditional notions of literary art?
--What does Reed have to say about monotheism vs. pantheism? What
people/groups in the book are each associated with?
--Talk a bit about the mythic background Reed uses toward the end of
the novel. What is he doing with the ancient Egyptian myths of
Isis/Osiris/Set?
--This is certainly not a traditionally realistic novel. How
would you characterize it instead? Discuss the style of the novel
and what you think Reed is trying to accomplish with the form he has
chosen.
Possible Topics:
--Sort out, as best as you can, the novel's structure. What are
the different types of chapters? What are the major
timeframes? What events occurred in the past? What is
happening in the present? Was there a point in the book
when the novel's structure became more clear to you?
--Discuss the figure of Cacciato. How is he described? What
does he seem to represent to the rest of the men?
--Provide a close reading of the chapter when the men fall down the
hole in the road to Paris. Why do they fall? What do the
tunnels suggest? What happens down there and why? How do
they get out? What role does Sarkin Ang Wan play in this?
--What happens to Lt. Sydney Martin?
--Examine the scene in Chapter 44 that mocks the Paris peace
talks. Whose argument do you find most convincing, Sarkin Ang
Wan's or Paul Berlin's? Which position do you think O'Brien
advocates? Does Paul Berlin ultimately fail in courage, or do the
right thing by returning to the war at the end?
Possible Topics:
--What are the four specific techniques that Wolfe says the New
Journalists learned from the realistic novelists? Look at
"Radical Chic" and/or "Mau-mauing the Flak Catcher" and discuss how
Wolfe himself uses these techniques. How successful do you think
he is?
--How legitimate do you believe the New Journalism is? Can it
really be called "journalism" as Wolfe claims? Or do you agree
with critics who claim it's a form much too subjective to be considered
non-fiction? Is it useful or cumbersome to retain old
distinctions between fact and fiction anyway?
--Why do you think Didion chooses the particular sort of brief
snapshot-type style she uses for her essay? What, according to
Didion, has happened to traditional plot, narrative?
--Does Didion present a slightly darker view of the 60's than you are
used to? How so? Why? What seems to be her overall
take on that decade?
Possible Topics:
--Do you think Tom Wolfe himself is "on the bus" or "off the bus"? In other words, how fully do you trust Wolfe's
depiction of Ken Kesey and the Merry Pranksters in the book? Do
you detect any bias in Wolfe's account? Does he seem to like and
admire the Pranksters, possibly romanticize them even? Or do you
think Wolfe finally undermines the Pranksters?
--What is Kesey's relationship to the older
radical movements and ideas that he displaces--the 1950's bohemians,
the hipness of black culture, political activism, the Perry Lane crowd,
even Timothy Leary and his group? Is there a sense that STYLE has
replaced true political involvement? If so, how does Wolfe
present this--is it a good thing or a bad thing?
--Look at the theme of control in the book
(perhaps best represented by the "Tower of Control" at the Tripps
Festival). Does Kesey become increasingly controlling as the book
progresses? How are we to feel about the ethics of what's
happening? (What about the schism among the pranksters?
What about people who don't quite fit in such as Stark Naked, Sandy, or
the Who Cares Girl?)
Possible Topics:
-- In a review of The Executioner's Song, Diane Johnson writes that the novel may
be considered "literary ambulance-chasing." Other readers have
criticized Mailer for writing a basically and fundamentally "immoral"
novel because it devotes so much dispassionate attention (over 1,000
pages worth) to a cold-blooded murderer. Other critics, though, argue
that the novel is Mailer's best work to date. Which view do you
take? Is the novel immoral and exploitative? Does it
glorify Gilmore? Or does it manage to be a "true-crime" story
that works, that rises above the status of "literary ambulance-chasing"?
--Does your view of Gilmore change as the novel progresses? Does
he become more monstrous the more we see of him? Or does he, as
at least one critic argues, become increasingly a tragic hero,
especially after he's arrested and imprisoned again?
--What are we to think of Lawrence Schiller? How does Mailer
present him?
--What do you think of Mailer's depictions of Gilmore's victims?
Does he treat them fairly or condescendingly?
--What do you think about some of the admissions Mailer makes in his
afterword to the novel?
Possible Topics:
--Look at either Macon Dead II, Ruth, or Pilate and talk about this
character's function in the novel.
--Examine a particularly memorable image or recurring motif in the
novel (Ruth's watermark, eggs, gold/ginger, the rose petals sewn by
Lena and Corinthians, the peacock, etc.)
--Discuss the emphasis on names and naming in the novel. Perhaps
examine individual characters' names? Talk about the relationship
between names and history?
--What are we supposed to think about Guitar Baines and The Seven
Days? Is Guitar an appealing character or an appalling
character? Explain.
--Provide a close reading of the very end of the novel (the last two
pages or so). How are we supposed to read and interpret what
happens here?
Possible Topics:
--What do the "tracks" of the title refer
to? Are there literal "tracks" in the novel? How do tracks
work as a metaphor in Erdrich's fiction? Why do you think Erdrich
chose to title this novel Tracks?
--Discuss the structure of the novel.
Why does Erdrich choose two alternating narrators? How does this
form relate to the novel's content?
--What are we to think of Pauline
Puyat? Is she simply crazy? Are we to feel any
sympathy/admiration for her at all? What does her function
in the novel seem to be?
--Look at Erdrich's prose style. Is
it lyrically beautiful, as many readers believe? Or is it
overwrought, too writing-schoolish as some critics have charged?
How does Erdrich's style affect you? Do you think it works or not?
--Why doesn't Fleur tell her own
story? What are we to think of Fleur? Why does she hasten
her own destruction at the end?
Possible Topics:
--Consider the novel's epigraph from
Meridel Le Seur. How does this quote shape and inform the book?
--Is Ginny an entirely reliable
narrator? Can we completely trust her perception of events?
Why do you think Smiley chose Ginny to narrate the story? How
would the book have been different with a different narrator?
--If you're familiar with King Lear, talk about Lear parallels in the novel.
How well do you think these work?
--Some reviewers arged that Smiley went too
far in making Larry Cook commit the particular offenses that he
does--that such a decision robs the Lear character of his majesty,
making him unambiguously bad. Do you agree or disagree with this
assessment?
--What are we supposed to think about Jess
Clark? Is he a villain or a victim? An admirable rebel or a
cowardly failure?
--How do you read the ending of the
novel? Is it entirely tragic? Does Smiley leave us with any
hope for the future?
The written portion of this assignment has two parts: 1)you
will write an annotated bibliography of at least ten outside sources on
your book; and 2)you will identify and briefly explain what seem to
you to be the two or three dominant themes or recurring concerns
in the criticism regarding the book.
1. Background Source Material: One or two of your sources (no more) may be from standard research works that are often helpful in getting background information about an author or work. Works you'll probably find particularly useful include Contemporary Authors and The Dictionary of Literary Biography.
2. Reviews: I encourage you to use book reviews as sources for this assignment. However, you need to use the type of review usually called the "essay-review." Essay-reviews are longer and more analytical than standard reviews which often consist mostly of plot summary. The reviews which appear in The New York Review of Books, The New York Times Book Review, The Village Voice, The Nation, and other such journals may be particularly useful. Reviews which appeared in large newspapers such as The New York Times, The Boston Globe, or The Washington Post are available on the Lexis-Nexis database.
3. Published Interviews: The contemporary authors we will study this semester have given dozens of interviews in various places (some more than others, of course). Interviews can be a good source for understanding what authors may have intended in particular works, or how they understand their own works. A good source for both book reviews and recent interviews is the InfoTrac Academic Index, which often includes full text for the articles cited. For some of the authors we are reading (Vonnegut, Morrison, Erdrich, possibly others), numerous interviews have been collected together and published in book form.
4. Critical Articles: The most useful items to your research will probably be published critical articles on the works we are reading. Look for critical articles in periodical indexes, especially InfoTrac's Expanded Academic Index and the MLA Index (which you can find on-line in the College's list of databases). You can then find the article in our periodical room, order it through interlibrary loan, or possibly even get a full-text version off the computer. If you need help wading through the large number of articles you might find, don't hesitate to come see me in my office. Often, the best or most influential articles about a work or author are collected together and published in book form. So don't forget to search the on-line catalog for books on the authors.
5. Historical Source Material: One option you may not have considered yet is researching a particular historical sub-text in your work. For instance, you might be interested in U.S. government/Indian relations in Louise Erdrich's Tracks. In this case, you might want to include some sources that give historical background about legislation involving Indians. Or you might need to research specifics about Ojibwa history or myth. Historical sources such as these are fine to use.
The sources that you include should appear in bibliography format (alphabetized, of course!), with their MLA-style citation first, followed by a brief paragraph summarizing the source's main argument.
Part II
For the second part of this assignment, you'll need to identify and explain two or three of the main themes or concerns you discover in the criticism of your work. What are the main issues the critics discuss? How do they agree or disagree about these issues? What I'd like to see you do in this section is some synthesis of the criticism. Group together and discuss the varying views. Don't, though, try to account for EVERYTHING in the criticism; choose two or three key strands to focus on.
EXAMPLESGo To:
Description
Your major essay in the class, an approximately 15-page research paper, is designed to build on the work you've already done in your annotated bibliography. Now that you've read the book carefully, discussed it in class, and researched some ideas that have been published about it, you should be ready to develop your own argument. Your paper should present a specific, well-focused, argument (your thesis) about some fairly narrow topic within the novel. While the main point of the paper is for you to provide your own argument about your focused topic, you should also place this argument within a critical context or conversation. The paper should be constructed so as to carefully support your argument--to persuade your readers that your interpretation is plausible, interesting, original, well-thought-out, and well-researched.
I will be happy to discuss your
research, your thesis, or a rough draft with you before the paper is
due. Feel free to drop by my office hours or make an
appointment if you'd like to discuss your paper with me in more detail.
A rough draft of the paper is due ten days after your annotated bibliography and class presentation. Final versions of the research paper are due at the end of the semester.
Format
The paper should be typed,
double-spaced, and free of grammatical errors. Sources should be cited
according to MLA guidelines--a system of internal citations and works
cited page at the end. You needn't cite every source listed in
your annotated bibliography--use only what's applicable. You cast
your net wide in the bibliography; now's the time to narrow your focus.
Hints for successfully choosing a topic
--Focus, focus, focus. Do not choose an overly broad topic such as "the theme of identity in Song of Solomon." Instead, narrow your topic. Rather than trying to cover all aspects of identity, focus on names and naming in the novel; talk about relationships between fathers and sons; look at ancestor figures; focus on a particular character or perhaps a couple of characters who take different approaches to discovering their identity (Milkman vs. Guitar); explore a particular mythic background (the Daedalus and Icarus myth in Song of Solomon), etc.
--As you're thinking about your focus in this paper, you might begin by looking back at the main strands of criticism you wrote about in your bibliography. If critics disagree about a particular issue, you may want to write a paper which enters into a critical disagreement. In this case, you'd begin by briefly summarizing the critical controversy, then your paper would go on to argue the view you take, providing plenty of evidence to support your reading. If you choose this option, you should have something new and original to contribute to the discussion. Don't simply rehash arguments that have already been made. You might also look back at the position paper topics for ideas.
--Focus on a particular repeated image or a recurring literary motif (television in White Noise, writing/the written word in Tracks, eyes/seeing in Slaughterhouse-Five, the observation post/telescopes, etc. in Going After Cacciato, etc.) How does this repeated image or motif add to our understanding of the novel as a whole?
--Consider comparing a narrow topic from your book to another we've read in the course: How do Vonnegut and O'Brien rearrange chronology in their works? Do DeLillo and Vonnegut agree in their views of modern technology? What do Wolfe and Didion believe are the strengths and weaknesses of the 1960s counter-culture movements? Do they agree about these? Examine how Reed, Erdrich and Morrison all show the power of the written word and official documents. What do Morrison and Smiley have to say about fatherhood?
Go To:
Exams will include questions asking you to identify important names,
terms, and concepts from the course. You may be asked to identify
and explain the significance of quotations from the works as
well. In addition, exams will include longer essay
questions. I'll give you more information about the course exams
closer to the dates they occur.
Go To: