|
Research
Interests
Kristin
D. Krantzman, Professor of Chemistry
Department
of Chemistry and Biochemistry, College of Charleston
|
Introduction
Our
computational research program is aimed at understanding the complex
energy transfer processes that occur in the high-energy bombardment
of organic solids with atomic and polyatomic projectiles. In the
last twenty-five years, molecular dynamics simulations have contributed
immensely to our understanding of the processes underlying the bombardment
of atomic solids and molecular overlayers on atomic solids, which
has been applied to the keV bombardment of solids in secondary ion
mass spectrometry (SIMS), fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry
and sputtering. Recently, there has been considerable interest in
the use of polyatomic projectiles for organic and biological SIMS
because they have been shown to increase the secondary ion yield
by an order of magnitude or more. Our simulations have provided
mechanistic insights into how polyatomics projectiles affect both
the yield of desorbed molecules and the damage to the sample as
compared to atomic projectiles.
Barbara J. Garrison, Arnaud Delcorte and Kristin D. Krantzman, "Molecule
Liftoff from Surfaces", Accts. Chem. Res. 2000,
33, 69-97. [PDF]
|
Molecular
Dynamics Simulations
In
our group, we perform experiments on the computer using the method
of molecular dynamics simulation. Molecular dynamics is a sophisticated
game of billiards where the atoms are the 'balls' and move according
to classical equations of motion. The key to building a viable model
is to use forces that describe the appropriate chemistry. Animations
of the motions of the atoms as they move in time can be created
from the simulations. We use the method to study how processes between
gaseous atoms and solids occur on a microscopic level.
Barbara
J. Garrison, "Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Surface Chemical
Reactions", Chem. Soc. Reviews 1992,
121, 155-162. [PDF] |
| Secondary
Ion Mass Spectrometry
Secondary
ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) is a technique used to analyze surfaces
of solid samples. A high energy primary ion beam, such as Ar+ or
Cs+, impacts the surface. The resulting sputtered species are collected
and analyzed by a mass spectrometer. The primary ion dose is very
low so that each ion essentially impacts a fresh area of the surface.
There is considerable interest in the use of polyatomc projectiles
(Agn+, SF5+, C60+) because they may increase the secondary ion yield
without a comparable increase in the damage to the surface, thereby
improving sensitivity.
|
Collaborators
Arnaud
Delcorte, Dept of Materials Science, UCL, Belgium
Professor
Barbara J. Garrison, Shapiro Professor of Chemistry, Department
of Chemistry, Penn State
Professor
Michael L. Myrick, Professor , Department of Chemistry and Associate
Director, USC Nanocenter, University of South Carolina
Professor
Zbigniew Postawa, Instytut Fizyki, Uniwersytet Jagiellonski, Kraków,
Poland
Professor
Tracy A. Schoolcraft, Professor of Chemistry, Department of Chemistry,
Shippensburg University
Professor
Steven J. Stuart, Associate Professor of Chemistry, Department of
Chemistry, Clemson University
Professor
Nicholas Winograd, Professor of Chemistry, Department of Chemistry,
Materials Science Institute, Penn State |
Mechanisms
for ejection of molecules and molecular fragments
An
illustration of the bombardment process is shown in the animation,
which can be viewed by clicking on the figure. Here, an SF5 projectile
impacts a monolayer of biphenyl molecules on a silicon substrate.
The energetic particle strikes the surface and initiates a high
degree of action in the solid. Collision cascades develop and atoms
are displaced from their initial positions. Although the incident
energy is much higher than the bond strength between individual
atoms in the molecules, intact molecules are ejected from the surface.
Molecules that are hit directly by the bombarding
projectile are fragmented. In order for molecules to be ejected
intact, they must be gently hit from underlying substrate atoms
that lift the molecule off the surface. For large molecules with
multiple contact points to the surface, cooperative lifting in which
several substrate atoms hit different parts of the molecule is necessary
for the ejection of stable, whole molecules. It is the upward motion
of the substrate atoms in the top few layers of the substrate that
is responsible for the production of ejected intact molecules. Consequently,
the downward momentum of the bombarding projectile must be redirected
into the upward momentum of the top few layers of substrate atoms. |
Enhancement
with Polyatomic Projectiles
Our simulations have identified three factors that
are important for the enhancement with polyatomic projectiles.
Collaborating
collision cascades.
Polyatomic
projectiles enhance the emission yield by increasing the probability
of collaborating collision cascades. Molecules that have multiple
contact points to the surface are ejected intact when several substrate
atoms hit different parts of the molecule. The adjacent figures
illustrates how a copper dimer initiates adjacent collision cascades
in the substrate, resulting in the cooperative uplifting of the
biphenyl molecule. Collaborating collision cascades and cooperative
uplifting will be more essential to eject intact larger molecules.
Radomir Zaric,*;
Brenda Pearson,*; Kristin D. Krantzman and Barbara J. Garrison,
"Molecular Dynamics Simulations to Explore the Effect of Projectile
Size on the Ejection of Organic Targets from Metal Surfaces",
Int. J. Mass Spectrom. Ion Processes 1998,
174, 155-166. [PDF]
| Open
lattice structure of substrate |
0.60 keV SF5 bombardment of a monolayer of biphenyl molecules
on Cu(001)
Click on the figure
below to view an animation. |
0.60 keV SF5 bombardment of a monolayer of biphenyl molecules
on Si(100)
Click on the figure
below to view an animation. |
 |

|
The nature of the substrate is
also a critical factor for the effectiveness of polyatomic
projectiles. The enhancement in yield is greater on a substrate
with a more open lattice structure such as silicon than on
a more closely packed substrate such as copper. For the close-packed
copper substrate, the SF5 breaks apart as it hits the surface
and is reflected toward the vacuum. Collision cascades can
be generated in the top layer of the surface that result in
the ejection of molecules and fragments. With the silicon
substrate, on the other hand, the entire SF5 projectile is
able to penetrate the surface and break apart within the substrate.
The breakup of the cluster within the lattice initiates collision
cascades that lead to substrate atoms hitting the biphenyl
molecules from below, which results in upward movement of
the molecules towards the vacuum. Consequently, a greater
number of intact molecules are ejected.
Jennifer A. Townes, Anna K. White, Elizabeth
N. Wiggins, Kristin D. Krantzman, Barbara J. Garrison, Nicholas
Winograd, "Mechanism for Increased Yield with the SF5+
Projectile in Organic SIMS: The Substrate Effect", J.
Phys. Chem. A 1999, 24, 4587-4589.
[PDF]
|
Mass
ratio. The mass ratio between the substrate
atoms and the atoms in the projectile is also important. When
the mass of the atom (or atoms) of the projectile is much
larger than the mass of the substrate atoms, the projectile
passes through the solid without transferring much energy
to the atoms in the top surface layers. When the projectile
atom (or atoms) has much less mass than the substrate atoms,
the projectile reflects back off the surface, retaining much
of its initial kinetic energy. The greatest energy is transferred
to the surface atoms when the atoms in the projectile have
the same mass. The largest enhancements are observed when
the mass ratio between the atoms in the projectile and the
substrate atoms is closest to one. |
|
|