|
THE INSTITUTE |
|
|
|
Mayor
Riley |
|
|
|
|
|
MPA
STUDENTS |
|
|
COMMUNITY RESOURCES |
|
| |
|
College
of Charleston
Charleston, SC 29424
Phone: 843.953.6100
Fax: 843.953.6109
bonifaym@cofc.edu
|
|
|
Previous Projects
Economic Impact Analysis of the Cooper River Bridge Run
Institute staff conducted an economic impact analysis for the Cooper River Bridge Run. The analysis was a replication of the study the Institute conducted almost ten years ago. Needless to say, the local economic impact of the race on the Charleston area has grown as the race has grown. A survey of race participants in 2004 offered an estimate of the money spent on food, lodging and shopping while in town for the race. After coding the surveys, the data was entered into an input-output economic analysis model to generate a bottom line on how the money spent by participants translated into local economic activity. Last year’s economic impact from the over 30,0000 participants of the Cooper River Bridge Run was over $14 million. They spent, on average, $227 on meals and $166 on retail items. Although 60% of the runners and walkers come from South Carolina, forty-eight states are represented as well as a number of other countries. There was an expected 12,000 additional participants in 2005. This could easily increase the impact by $4 million dollars.
Weed and Seed Evaluation
The Riley Institute was contracted to conduct a mandated program evaluation for the city of North Charleston’s Weed and Seed program. The program encompassed four communities served by Weed and Seed. These communities were: Accabee, Union Heights, Liberty Hill, and Chicora Cherokee. The goals of Weed and Seed are listed below:
Law Enforcement: To eliminate drug trafficking, crack houses, prostitution, juvenile offenders and public nuisances in the target area.
Community Policing: To forge a better relationship between police and residents in the target area; to reduce the residents fear of crime; and to provide a safer community.
Prevention, Early Intervention and Treatment: To increase educational achievement among neighborhood youths; to reduce drug abuse, youth involvement.
Neighborhood Restoration: To develop micro-enterprise business and to beautify and improve the cleanliness and the physical environment of the target area.
The purpose of the evaluation is to show how well the program met these individual goals by analyzing statistical data and interviewing nonprofits and community leaders in the area.
North
Park Village HOPE VI Project
In November 2001, the North Charleston Housing Authority was awarded a
HOPE VI grant to revitalize North Park Village, a public housing complex
housing almost 500 families. The HOPE VI program is a grant program administered
by the U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development since 1993 in an effort
to transform public housing in the United States. Recognizing that traditional
public housing as a whole has failed, HOPE VI allows public housing authorities
to demolish and/or renovate distressed public housing developments and
replace these developments with mixed-income developments.
Some of the main goals
of the program include: changing the physical shape of public housing,
establishing positive incentives for resident self-sufficiency and comprehensive
services that work to empower residents, and lessening concentrations
of poverty by placing public housing in non-poor neighborhoods and promoting
mixed-income communities. The transformation of public housing under HOPE
VI requires that residents be relocated to other neighborhoods with an
option to move back into the rebuilt development. To learn more about
the HOPE VI program, click here.
HOPE
VI Self-Sufficiency Services
In January 2003, the Riley Institute was contracted to provide case management
and support services to the original residents of North Park Village.
In taking on this project, the Institute hired Rachel Luckey and Judith
N. Stokes as case managers. Ms. Luckey and Ms. Stokes worked to coordinate
and provide comprehensive services to the residents including employment
training, education, and life-skills counseling. The graduate assistants
at the Institute assisted the case managers with administrative
duties. The Institute's contract with HOPE VI expired in January of 2003. The HOPE VI project is now in Phase Three of moving residents
out of North Park Village.
The
Economic Impact of the College of Charleston (2001)
In the fall of 2001,
the Riley Institute began an economic impact analysis study to determine
the impact of the College of Charleston on the economy of the tri-county
area. This study was designed to complement a similar study the Institute
conducted in 1993. The more recent study concentrated on the impact students
at the College of Charleston make on the economy directly through their
spending and employment and indirectly through attracting visitors to
the area who would otherwise not be visiting Charleston.
Data was collected
through telephone surveys of a random sample of 394 College of Charleston
undergraduate and graduate students. Students were asked a series of questions
about their expenditures in the local economy. A basic input-output model-IMPLAN-was
used for the economic impact analysis. Based on the model constructed
for student expenditures, each $1 spent by a student has an approximate
$1.40 overall impact on the local economy as it recirculates.
The major findings
of the study are as follows:
- Excluding campus
expenditures, CofC students have a $221.3 million yearly impact on the
local economy.
- Expenditures made
by visitors that come to Charleston to see students also have an impact
on the local economy. If we assume that these visitors would not come
to Charleston if the student did not attend CofC, the visitors have
a $61.8 million yearly impact.
- Students and their
visitors create 4,366 jobs in the region.
- The total impact
of the College of Charleston on the region's economy is approximately
$408.8 million, creating 8,700 jobs.
The study also provided
interesting information about CofC students:
- Students host more
than 15,600 visitors per month.
- Approximately one-third
of out-of-state students indicated they wished to stay in South Carolina
after graduation. A little more than one-half of in-state students indicated
they also wished to stay.
- The highest categories
for student expenditures were rent ($38 million per year), eating/drinking
($26 million per year), and grocery shopping ($20 million per year).
Our
Priorities, Our Schools
The results of a study
conducted by the Institute for the Education
Foundation, "Our Priorities, Our Schools," was
released February 28, 2003, at the Business Education Summit at the Charleston
Convention Center. In January 2003, the Institute surveyed nearly 1,200
tri-county residents on a variety of issues concerning public education
in the area. This is the third year the Institute has conducted this study.
The study found that:
- 67% of local residents
think schools are under-funded.
- 69% of local residents
would support a tax increase to change that.
- Those surveyed
indicated that they had the most confidence in teachers to make good
public education decision, followed by parents and principals. The least
confidence was given to county councils and district administrators.
Back to Top |
|